The South American Cannabis Route: An Immersive Ethnography of Consumption, Markets, and Sociopolitical Disputes on the Pacific Coast
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71068/7gcfsa05Keywords:
Cannabis, Ethnography, Regulation, Harm reduction.Abstract
Introduction: This study analyzes the social, territorial, economic, and political dynamics associated with cannabis through an ethnographic journey across cities on the South American Pacific coast. The problem is approached from the premise that consumption practices, markets, and forms of control are not distributed homogeneously, but depend on specific historical, moral, institutional, and geographical configurations. Objective: To comparatively characterize how recreational cannabis consumption practices, markets, and sociopolitical disputes are configured in cities across Chile, Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia. Method: An immersive, multi-sited ethnography was conducted between February and May 2026, combining participant and non-participant observation, informal interviews, and field conversations. The corpus included interactions with 59 people differently connected to cannabis scenes and records from urban, commercial, institutional, and border settings. Information was organized through thematic coding and cross-city comparison. Results: The findings revealed differentiated configurations. Chile combined social tolerance with discretionary control; Peru showed greater discretion, stigma, and access through closed networks; Ecuador displayed overlapping formal, gray, and informal circuits; and Colombia stood out for high public visibility, organizational density, and regulatory contestation. Market formalization and social normalization did not necessarily move in the same direction. Conclusions: Cannabis constitutes a relational and territorially variable social object. Its everyday regulation depends on trust networks, local moralities, commercial infrastructure, formalization capacities, and state control. Public policies should recognize these differences and avoid uniform regulatory models.
References
1. Queirolo R, Kilmer B, Repetto L, Pardal M, Sotto B, Alvarez E. Intended and unintended effects of cannabis regulation in Uruguay. Policy Polit. 2024;1-18. https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2024D000000051
2. Pardal M, Queirolo R, Repetto L, Rychert M. A decade of regulated Cannabis Social Clubs in Uruguay: five key developments and challenges ahead. Int J Drug Policy. 2026;151:105213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2026.105213.
3. Barry RA. Challenges achieving horizontal coherence across health and public security policies in formulating Uruguay's cannabis regulation. Health Promot Int. 2024;39(5):daae136. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae136.
4. Durán-Martínez A, Pennell C. Change from above or pressure from below? The diffusion of cannabis reform in Latin America. Bull Lat Am Res. 2024;43:347-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13580.
5. Manthey J, Jacobsen B, Hayer T, Kalke J, López-Pelayo H, Pons-Cabrera MT, et al. The impact of legal cannabis availability on cannabis use and health outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Drug Policy. 2023;116:104039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104039.
6. Nazif-Munoz JI, Domínguez-Cancino K, Martínez P, Jauffret-Roustide M. Uneven effects of twenty years of Chile's cannabis policy implementation in cannabis onset. Int J Drug Policy. 2024;127:104395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104395.
7. Bogren A, Castillo D. Beyond networks and institutions: rethinking the role of organization in illicit drug market interaction. Crime Media Cult. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958241289361
8. Repetto L, Queirolo R, Alonso J, Pardal M, Atuesta L, Kilmer B, et al. Conceptualizing cannabis grey markets: a typology based on the Uruguayan case. Int J Drug Policy. 2025;145:105020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.105020.
9. Donnan JR, Howells R, Farooq S, Maillet M, Harris-Lane LM. Bridging the gap: exploring consumer experiences and motivations for transitioning between illicit and regulated cannabis markets. Int J Drug Policy. 2024;134:104644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104644.
10. Maillet MA. Individual differences in legal and illicit cannabis purchasing behaviour in British Columbia, Canada: findings from a 2021 cross-sectional survey. Int J Drug Policy. 2024;126:104363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104363.
11. Queirolo R, Rychert M, Pardal M. Market revenues and economic opportunities in the legal cannabis market in Uruguay. J Illicit Econ Dev. 2025;7(2):25-38. https://doi.org/10.31389/jied.250.
12. Durán-Martínez A, Fakhoury R. Who influences whom? Elite and citizen preferences regarding marijuana and drug legalisation in Latin America. J Politics Lat Am. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X251369520
13. Rivera-Vélez L, Díaz MC. Constructing policy paradigms through implementation: medical cannabis reforms in Colombia and Argentina. Lat Am Policy. 2025;16(4):e70031. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.70031.
14. Wong-Salgado P, Moya-Salazar J, Contreras-Pulache H, Pardo-Villarroel C. The regulatory and scientific context in the study of the medicinal use of cannabis in Peru. Front Med. 2025;12:1598227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1598227.
15. Castillo-Carniglia A. National profile on substance use, substance use-related problems and policy: the case of Chile. Addiction. 2025;120(7):1466-1474. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70031.
16. del Rio Forero D, Marín CP, Sastre MTM, et al. Mapping Colombians' positions on national policies to control tobacco and marijuana consumption: a pilot study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2025;20:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-025-00646-w.
17. Bedoya Sandoval JF, Arroyo Valencia LD, Molano Agudelo PA. Knowledge and attitudes toward medical cannabis among medicine, nursing, and physiotherapy students at a Colombian university: a cross-sectional study with multivariate analysis. J Cannabis Res. 2026;8:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-026-00423-x.
18. Müller F, Rasmussen N. Cultural stigmatization and police corruption: cannabis, gender, and legalization in Mexico. Contemp Justice Rev. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2021.2004089
19. Ferreyra FG, Mosqueira M. Drugs and religion in Latin America: a narrative literature review. Contemp Drug Probl. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914509251314203
20. Bathish R, Madden A, Duff C, Ritter A. Guiding principles for breaking down drug-related stigma in academic writing. Int J Drug Policy. 2024;131:104515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104515.
21. Holland A, Freeman TP, Nicholls J, Burke C, Howkins J, Harris M, et al. Making sense of drug use and dependence: a scoping review of mass media interventions intended to reduce stigma towards people who use drugs. Int J Drug Policy. 2024;132:104543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104543.
22. Santos JM, Teixeira ZM, Soliz M, Guerra MM. Consumo de cannabis, grau de risco e policonsumos numa amostra de adultos portugueses. Rev Enferm Ref. 2022;6(1):e21152. https://doi.org/10.12707/RV21152.
23. Buschner M, Heckel N, Dürler P, Engeli EJ, Schneider S, Havelka EM, et al. The Züri Can study: can regulated cannabis sales promote lower-risk cannabis use? Mini-review and study protocol. Int J Drug Policy. 2024;133:104610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104610.
24. DeJonckheere M, Vaughn LM, James TG, Schondelmeyer AC. Qualitative thematic analysis in a mixed methods study: guidelines and considerations for integration. J Mix Methods Res. 2024;18(3):258-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241257546.
25. Naeem M, Ozuem W, Howell K, Ranfagni S. A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2023;22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
26. Byrne D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant. 2022;56:1391-1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y.
27. Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, Kahlke R. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach. 2023;45(3):241-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
28. Vanke A. Multi-sited ethnography: developing avant-garde methodology for creative research into everyday lives. Sociol Res Online. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804251345915
29. Prasad A, Shadnam M. Balancing breadth and depth in qualitative research: conceptualizing performativity through multi-sited ethnography. Organ Stud. 2023;44(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221145655
30. Warren A, Gibson C. Follow the labour process: constructing explanations and making a difference through multi-sited ethnographic methods. Environ Plan A Econ Space. 2026;58(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X251326393
31. LoParco CR, Speer M, Chakraborty R, Yang YT, Berg CJ. Cannabis social equity initiatives among U.S. states with legal nonmedical cannabis retail: a review and recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 2026;70(6):108218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108218.
32. Han J, Durand-Morat A. Does sin tax on the legal market facilitate the illicit market? An ex-ante assessment on the US cannabis market. J Agric Appl Econ Assoc. 2024;3(2):330-345. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.114.
33. Wu G, Durante KA, Melton HC, Roddy AL. Marijuana legalization and racial disparities in prison incarceration in Colorado and Washington State: a quasi-experimental study. J Exp Criminol. 2025;21:325-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09590-w.
34. Rivera-Vélez L. Dissenting implementation of cannabis policies in Mexico: a strategy of outlaw resistance. Bull Lat Am Res. 2025;44(4):310-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.70000.
35. Hammond D, Hong D, Rundle S, Iraniparast M, Kilmer B, Wadsworth E. Transitions to legal cannabis markets: legal market capture of cannabis expenditures in Canada following federal cannabis legalization. Int J Drug Policy. 2025;142:104828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104828.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Israel Zumaya Sandoval (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


